IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/313608.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Feasibility of Shipping Fresh Apricots and Prunes Jumble Packed in Fiberboard Boxes

Author

Listed:
  • Fountain, James B.
  • Hovey, Roy M.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: Rising costs of labor and materials have forced a reappraisal of shipping containers for fresh apricots and prunes. The row-faced wood box for apricots and the ring-faced wood-veneer basket for prunes have been the most commonly used containers for shipping these fruits to market for many years. The purpose of this study was to find out (1) how much the cost of marketing these fruits could be reduced if they were packed and shipped in fiberboard boxes instead of in wood boxes or wood-veneer baskets, and (2) if the bruising of apricots and prunes would be greater or less by jumble packing them in fiberboard boxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fountain, James B. & Hovey, Roy M., 1969. "Feasibility of Shipping Fresh Apricots and Prunes Jumble Packed in Fiberboard Boxes," Marketing Research Reports 313608, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313608
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313608/files/mrr839.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.