IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/313404.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Food Dating: Shoppers' Reactions and the Impact on Retail Foodstores

Author

Listed:
  • Economic Research Service, Marketing Economics Division

Abstract

Eighteen percent of 1,500 shoppers interviewed by telephone in 1971 reported purchasing food in the previous 2 weeks that became "bad" before it should have. Most problems were reported with meat, dairy products, baked goods, and fresh produce. Shoppers interviewed at selected Ohio retail chainstores before and after an 8-week experimental open-dating program were asked about their satisfaction with foods purchased. The frequency with which shoppers reported instances of purchasing "bad" food was reduced by half after open (uncoded) dates and improved handling practices were introduced. The use of open dates and improved handling practices also reduced in-store product losses. Results indicated that food date labeling may be beneficial to shoppers because it gives them increased assurance of food freshness and to retailers because it promotes better food handling and stock rotation practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Economic Research Service, Marketing Economics Division, 1973. "Food Dating: Shoppers' Reactions and the Impact on Retail Foodstores," Marketing Research Reports 313404, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313404
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313404/files/mrr984.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.