IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/313191.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fiber Quality and Ginning Performance of Machine Picked and Stripped Cotton, Southeastern Area, 1964-66

Author

Listed:
  • Garner, W. E.
  • Shanklin, E. H.
  • LaFerney, P. E.

Abstract

Excerpt from the report: A 3-year study was conducted at the Southeastern Cotton Ginning Research Laboratory, Clemson, S.C, to compare the ginning performance, fiber quality, and spinning performance of cotton harvested with a spindle picker and with a brush-type stripper and to evaluate cotton conditioning and cleaning treatments for ginning cotton harvested by the two methods. The study was made on Auburn 56 variety cotton in the 1964, 1965, and 1966 crop seasons, in cooperation with the Agricultural Research Service Pilot Spinning Laboratory, also at Clemson, S.C.

Suggested Citation

  • Garner, W. E. & Shanklin, E. H. & LaFerney, P. E., 1970. "Fiber Quality and Ginning Performance of Machine Picked and Stripped Cotton, Southeastern Area, 1964-66," Marketing Research Reports 313191, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313191
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313191/files/mrr852.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.