Author
Listed:
- Mathis, Anthony G.
- Johnson, Robert W.
- Anderson, Elsie D.
Abstract
Excerpts from the report: This is a report of eight studies of techniques in sampling milk and testing it for butterfat content. Most of the methods studied have been suggested by Federal order market administrators or others as subjects needing research, because there was insufficient reliable knowledge as to whether they cause significant difference in test results. If duplicate series of samples are tested by techniques differing even slightly, the average percentages of butterfat and the variations around these averages may be different. Variations in test results, beyond those inherent in the Babcock test, also may be caused by a number of factors, such as slight differences between individuals in performing testing routines, difference in the representativeness of samples, and slight differences in procedures. Variations of this kind can be controlled, and to this end the present study is addressed. Specifically, the task of this present study is: 1. To determine how and to what extent the use of different techniques in sampling and testing may affect test results. 2. To indicate biases and variations in test results along with probability that variations of a given size will occur when a given technique is used.
Suggested Citation
Mathis, Anthony G. & Johnson, Robert W. & Anderson, Elsie D., 1961.
"Selected Problems in Butterfat Sampling and Testing,"
Marketing Research Reports
312610, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:uamsmr:312610
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.312610
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:312610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.