IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/311379.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of Shipping Containers for Washington Cherries

Author

Listed:
  • Fountain, James B.
  • Chapogas, Peter G.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: It was estimated that 91 percent of the Washington State Bing and Lambert variety cherries shipped to market in 1957 were face-packed in 15-pound wood boxes, 8 percent were packed loose in 20-pound wood boxes, and 1 percent (mostly smaller cherries) were packed loose in 12- and 14-pound boxes. During the 1958 and 1959 seasons shippers experimented with cherries packed in consumer size plastic baskets. The Washington State cherry industry, much aware of rising costs of labor and materials, has wanted to ship most of its cherries in less expensive packs. However, the industry has been uncertain about the advantages and disadvantages of changing a substantial part of its production from the more expensive faced pack (generally known as the double row face) to the less expensive but less attractive loose pack. Because of potential savings, the industry has been particularly interested in the larger 20-pound loose cherry pack. During 1957, preliminary studies were begun on cherry shipping containers then in use. These studies were continued during 1958 and 1959. The three most widely used cherry packs were studied; (1) the 15-pound face, (2) the 20-pound loose, and (3) the 14-pound loose. The objective of this study was to evaluate containers used by the Washington cherry industry by comparing container and accessory material costs, labor requirements, arrival condition, and trade acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Fountain, James B. & Chapogas, Peter G., 1960. "Evaluation of Shipping Containers for Washington Cherries," Marketing Research Reports 311379, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:311379
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.311379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/311379/files/mrr426.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.311379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:311379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.