IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/311211.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effectiveness of Selected Canned Food Displays in Supermarkets

Author

Listed:
  • Grubbs, Violet Davis
  • Smith, Hugh M.
  • Wischkaemper, Paul
  • Havas, Nick

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: This report evaluates sales effectiveness and efficiency of selected retail merchandising techniques for canned fruits and vegetables in retail food stores. The special displays appraised in this study were located at the end of the grocery gondola (shelves where cans are stacked). They were selected with the advice of the cooperating retailer as typical types of such displays currently in use and ranged from the informal jumbled display to the formally arranged pile-on display. Twelve supermarkets of a New England chain operating largely in the Boston metropolitan area were used for testing different methods of merchandising. The test stores had an annual gross sales volume per store averaging almost $2 million. Because all test stores were under one central management, it was possible to maintain a uniform price for each brand and size of items tested as well as of the substitute items, and to display the same number of brands and sizes of the test commodities throughout the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Grubbs, Violet Davis & Smith, Hugh M. & Wischkaemper, Paul & Havas, Nick, 1959. "Effectiveness of Selected Canned Food Displays in Supermarkets," Marketing Research Reports 311211, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:311211
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.311211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/311211/files/mrr371.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.311211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:311211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.