IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/310944.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Costs of Packing Michigan Peaches in 1957

Author

Listed:
  • Podany, Joseph C.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report Introduction: This report is concerned with the costs of packing peaches in the principal producing area of southwest Michigan. It is a part of a continuing study of marketing practices designed to improve efficiency and lower costs. In this report peach packing costs are presented for two types of packing sheds--farm and central sheds. Farm sheds (the smaller sheds) handled fruit of one grower and were usually located on the farm of the owner. Central sheds (the larger sheds) handled fruit of many growers and were located in small cities. Previous studies have indicated that large, well-managed packing sheds generally have, lower costs than well-managed smaller sheds because they can use more labor saving machinery, have more efficient utilization of labor, buy supplies in large quantities, and can spread overhead costs over a greater volume of output. Under actual operating conditions in 1957, the central sheds were operating under their full packing capacity to such an extent that their costs were considerably higher than they would have been at capacity operation. Farm sheds, on the other hand, made greater use of their existing packing capacity and, thereby, were able to keep costs down.

Suggested Citation

  • Podany, Joseph C., 1958. "Costs of Packing Michigan Peaches in 1957," Marketing Research Reports 310944, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:310944
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.310944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/310944/files/mrr290.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.310944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:310944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.