IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/310882.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Homemakers Appraise Cotton, Wool, and Other Fibers in Household Furnishings

Author

Listed:
  • Levine, Daniel B.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: In recent years, marked changes have taken place in the fibers available to the consumer in the household textile market. Between 1950 and 1955, cotton poundage used in household items, which accounted for 72 percent of all fibers in 1950, showed relatively little change; poundage of manmade fibers increased by about 50 percent during this period, from 8.5 percent of the total in 1950 to about 18 percent in 1955. Particular interest, therefore, has centered on the extent of substitution for cotton by manmade fibers in the household textile field, as well as acceptance and experience in use of the different fibers by the consumer. The findings reported are based on the responses of 2,709 homemakers and, for the most part, apply only to those items used within the year preceding the survey. Interviews were conducted during June and July 1957. The broad objectives of the study included: 1. Ascertaining the position of cotton, wool, and competitive fibers in each of the above end uses. 2. Examining how and to what extent consumers are reacting to and accepting fibers and fiber blends in each of these household furnishings. 3. Determining consumers' opinions and attitudes toward the fibers used in each item.

Suggested Citation

  • Levine, Daniel B., 1958. "Homemakers Appraise Cotton, Wool, and Other Fibers in Household Furnishings," Marketing Research Reports 310882, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:310882
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.310882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/310882/files/mrr279.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.310882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:310882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.