IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/310676.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Marketing Meat-Type Hogs: Problems, Practices, and Potentials in the United States and Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Engelman, Gerald
  • Gaarder, Raymond O.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report Introduction: In submitting its report on the Department of Agriculture and Farm Credit Administration Appropriation Bill for 1958, the Subcommittee on Agriculture of the House Committee on Appropriations gave particular emphasis to what is often called the meat-type hog problem. The subcommittee stated that during the previous year it had received considerable testimony on this subject. There was general agreement that an expanded production of meat-type hogs is desirable. Hogs of meat -type strains have been developed in this country for some time. Members of the subcommittee said that farmers developing meat-type hogs do not find it possible to obtain a fair price in the market for their extra efforts. Consumers might consume more pork if they were assured of tasty, lean pork. Hog producers and the entire hog industry suffer because of the lack of price advantage that would encourage the production of a type of pork more marketable at the retail level. The subcommittee indicated that it understood that Canada has made progress in providing incentives for the production of this type of animal, and that the progress is reflected in increased markets and prices for Canadian hogs, especially for A grade carcasses. The subcommittee recommended that appropriate officials of the Department make a thorough study of the Canadian program so as to develop better markets and prices to American hog producers. In response to that request, the Department sent a team of seven swine production and marketing specialists to visit Canada. The study team was instructed to pay particular attention to the grading and marketing methods in Canada. It was to appraise the effects of these methods on the characteristics of pork production in Canada and to give attention to the methods and techniques used in swine improvement. This report consists of three main sections. The first section discusses the emergence of the pork quality problem in the United States and some of the basic economic trends with which it has been associated. The second section reports on the history, the experience, and the present status of the Canadian swine industry in solving its problems with respect to producing and marketing its bacon-type hog. A final section appraises progress made in both countries, and discusses possible alternative courses of action for this country to follow, so as to produce and market a type of hog that yields less fat and more lean meat.

Suggested Citation

  • Engelman, Gerald & Gaarder, Raymond O., 1958. "Marketing Meat-Type Hogs: Problems, Practices, and Potentials in the United States and Canada," Marketing Research Reports 310676, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:310676
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.310676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/310676/files/mrr227.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.310676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaarder, Raymond O. & Engelman, Gerald & Kimbrell, Eddie F., 1962. "Grades of Hogs Slaughtered in the United States, September 1960 through August 1961," Miscellaneous Publications 319973, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:310676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.