IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/309963.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fibers: Opinions and Practices Among Manufacturers of Cordage and Twine

Author

Listed:
  • Bureau of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

The objectives of the study were: 1. To classify cordage and twine products in terms of end uses. 2. To estimate for each fiber the quantities used in various products in 1951. 3. To find out the characteristics desired in the fibers utilized in various products. 4. To find out whether the fibers currently in use have all of the characteristics desired in terms of end-product uses, and if not, to specify which characteristics are missing or need improvement. 5. To find out whether there are other fibers that would be better than those currently used. 6. To find out the trend in fibers now used for various products, and to learn what substitute fibers have been used.

Suggested Citation

  • Bureau of Agricultural Economics, 1953. "Fibers: Opinions and Practices Among Manufacturers of Cordage and Twine," Marketing Research Reports 309963, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:309963
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309963/files/mrr51.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309963?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:309963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.