IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/slco13/183918.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Black - Scholes Models Investment Evaluation for Potato Processing

Author

Listed:
  • Pazek, Karmen
  • Rozman, Crtomir
  • Kolenko, Matej

Abstract

A common method used for evaluation of investment projects is the Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). Desiring to have insight into the core of investment, the optional modules with real options are becoming more in use, which represent the stochastic approach. The basic purpose of this research was therefore to display applications of methods real options in agriculture. Results of the traditional CBA with the parameter NPVt showed the production of processed potatoes in cubes is the most suitable. For the assessment of real options investment projects of processing potatoes the Black Scholes model have been used further used. Option value (OV) to the Black-Scholes (BS) model show positive values for all three types of processing (french fries, slices and cubes). However, real options have important value, because the traditional methods of investment analysis are upgraded to the methods of real options with stochastic terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Pazek, Karmen & Rozman, Crtomir & Kolenko, Matej, 2013. "Black - Scholes Models Investment Evaluation for Potato Processing," 2013 Conference: Tools for decision support in agriculture and rural development, April 18-19, 2013, KrÅ¡ko, Slovenia 183918, Slovenian Association of Agricultural Economists (DAES).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:slco13:183918
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.183918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/183918/files/15-Karmen%20Pazek.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.183918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:slco13:183918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daesiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.