IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/sbrfsr/108970.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mercado Futuro De Soja Na Bmfe Cbot: Uma Análise No Período De 2005 A 2007

Author

Listed:
  • Dias, Vitor Caminha Faustino
  • Neto, Leonardo Francisco Figueiredo

Abstract

O presente trabalho busca calcular a base e o risco de base, razão ótima e eficiência do hedge da soja brasileira comercializada através dos contratos da Bolsa de Mercadorias e Futuros (BMF) e contrato de soja Latino-Americana da Chicago Board of Trade (SA-CBOT) e contrato de soja da Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT). O valor médio da base e o risco de base foram calculados na semana de vencimento dos 50 contratos considerados no periodo entre janeiro de 2005 a julho de 2007. O método adotado no cálculo da base é está em acordo com Hull (2005); o risco de base e a efetividade de hedge são propostos por Silveira (2002); Myers; Thompson (1989) estabelecem a motodologia para o cálculo da razão ótima. Do procedimento adotado neste, foram possivel observar os seguintes resultados: i) os menores valores médios da base foram em Paranaguá (em todas as bolsas). ii) apesar de possuir os menores valores médios de base, a CBOT apresentou maior risco de base que a BMF. Tanto o Mercado Futuro de soja da BMF quanto o mercado da CBOT, mostraram-se eficientes. Porém, não foi possível afirmar com precisão que o mercado futuro SA-CBOT é eficiente. A razão de hedge mostrou-se elevada, variando entre 87,20% - 64,77% (para BMF). A razão de hegde da soja em Illinois apresentou-se consideravelmente maior que as demais quando comercializada na CBOT. Conclui-se assim, que sojicultores brasileiros possuem, de maneira geral, melhor instrumento de proteção ao risco de preço quando comercializam na BMF.---------------------------------------------This dissertation analyses the hedge soybeans operations by using BMF and CBOT`s contracts, and considering Paranagua (PR), Sorriso (MT), Barreiras (BA) and Cascavel (PR). Initially, it was calculated the basis risk from the hedge operations in the ending week of each contract. It was considered transactions between BMF, CBOT and SA-CBOT (South America Soybeans Contract). It was also calculated the optimal hedge ratio by Myers; Thompson (1989) methodology. During January 2005 and July 2007, these exchanges had commercialized 50 contracts. this paper reaches the following results: i) the lower basis’ average was in Paranagua (considering all stock exchanges); ii) CBOT had smaller basis’ average but greater basis’ risk then BMF. On the second step of this analysis, both BMF and CBOT were considered efficient. However, the same result was not observed on SA-CBOT, which wasn’t possible to precise about its efficiency. The optimal hedge ratio (OHR) was high to BMF (87.20% - 64.77%). The OHR to Illinois was the greatest, 93.41% when commercialized with CBOT. This number is consistent with Dorfman; Sanders (2006). However, CBOT presents lower OHR whenever we consider the Brazilians places in this study (55.88% - 35.7%). We conclude that Brazilians soybeans’ farmers which want to protect against price in future market have a better tool by commercializing with BMF that CBOT or SA-CBOT.

Suggested Citation

  • Dias, Vitor Caminha Faustino & Neto, Leonardo Francisco Figueiredo, 2008. "Mercado Futuro De Soja Na Bmfe Cbot: Uma Análise No Período De 2005 A 2007," 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil 108970, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:108970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/108970
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kodde, David A & Palm, Franz C, 1986. "Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restriction s," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(5), pages 1243-1248, September.
    2. Huang, Zhimin & Li, Susan X., 1996. "Dominance stochastic models in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 390-403, December.
    3. Battese, George E. & Corra, Greg S., 1977. "Estimation Of A Production Frontier Model: With Application To The Pastoral Zone Of Eastern Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 21(03), December.
    4. Pitt, Mark M. & Lee, Lung-Fei, 1981. "The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 43-64, August.
    5. Schmidt, Peter & Sickles, Robin C, 1984. "Production Frontiers and Panel Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 2(4), pages 367-374, October.
    6. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter, 1977. "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, July.
    7. Meeusen, Wim & van den Broeck, Julien, 1977. "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 18(2), pages 435-444, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:108970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/soberea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.