IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Distribuição locacional agropecuária e concentração fundiária na Bacia Hidrográfica dos Rios Mogi Guaçu e Pardo


  • Ambrosio, Luis Alberto
  • Fasiaben, Maria Do Carmo Ramos
  • Romeiro, Ademar Ribeiro


As relações entre a distribuição locacional dos usos da terra e a concentração fundiária, nos municípios da Bacia Hidrográfica dos Rios Mogi Guaçu e Pardo, são analisadas empregando o Quociente Locacional, a Curva de Especialização e o Índice de Gini. Os resultados mostram uma concentração fundiária excessivamente alta: metade dos municípios apresenta grau de concentração médio a forte (Índice de Gini entre 0,501 e 0,700) e metade grau forte a muito forte (Índice de Gini entre 0,701 e 0,900). Rejeitou-se, pelo teste qui-quadrado a 5% de probabilidade, a hipótese nula de independência entre as classes de concentração da posse da terra e os tipos de especialização locacional dos usos da terra, no âmbito municipal. Verificou-se que nos municípios com alto quociente locacional com cana-de-açúcar também ocorre concentração de posse da terra em graus forte e muito forte. Por outro lado, os municípios com quocientes locacionais maiores que o padrão da bacia nas culturas perenes e anuais apresentaram menor concentração fundiária, quando comparados aos municípios não especializados nestas atividades. Já o grau de especialização na atividade de pastagem não apresentou relação significativa com a estrutura fundiária. Conclui-se que os indicadores propostos neste trabalho se mostraram eficientes para caracterizar a distribuição das atividades nos municípios da área de estudo, prestando-se os quocientes locacionais para análises de cunho regional (no presente caso, por município) e setorial (por atividade produtiva).------------------------------------------------This work examines the relationship between location distribution of the land uses and land concentration in the municipalities of the Mogi Guaçu and Pardo Rivers Watershed, employing the Location Quotient, the Specialization Curve and Gini Index. The results have shown a very high land concentration index: half of the municipalities presents medium to strong degrees of land concentration (Gini Index between 0,501 and 0,700) and the other half strong to very strong degrees (Gini Index between 0,701 and 0,900). The null hypothesis of the independence between land concentration classes and location distribution of the land uses was rejected by the chi-square test with 5% of probability. It was found also strong and very strong degrees of land concentration in municipalities with a high location quotient with sugar cane. On the other hand, the municipalities presenting location quotients with other crops larger than the standard found in the Watershed, presented lower concentration land when compared to municipalities more specialized in cattle raising activities. However, the degree of specialization in cattle raising activities was not correlated to the agrarian structure. The paper concludes that the indicators proposed have been efficient to characterize the distribution of the activities in the municipalities. The Location Quotient was useful for analysis at the regional levels (in this case, by municipality) and at the sector levels (by productive activity).

Suggested Citation

  • Ambrosio, Luis Alberto & Fasiaben, Maria Do Carmo Ramos & Romeiro, Ademar Ribeiro, 2008. "Distribuição locacional agropecuária e concentração fundiária na Bacia Hidrográfica dos Rios Mogi Guaçu e Pardo," 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil 108919, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:108919

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Edward B. Barbier, 2001. "The Economics of Tropical Deforestation and Land Use: An Introduction to the Special Issue," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(2), pages 155-171.
    2. Baland, Jean-Marie & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2000. "Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities?," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198290612.
    3. Robert T. Deacon, 1994. "Deforestation and the Rule of Law in a Cross-Section of Countries," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 70(4), pages 414-430.
    4. Steve Dowrick, 1986. "von Stackelberg and Cournot Duopoly: Choosing Roles," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(2), pages 251-260, Summer.
    5. Bhattarai, Madhusudan & Hammig, Michael, 2004. "Governance, economic policy, and the environmental Kuznets curve for natural tropical forests," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(03), pages 367-382, July.
    6. Gal-Or, Esther, 1985. "First Mover and Second Mover Advantages," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 26(3), pages 649-653, October.
    7. Alston, Lee J. & Libecap, Gary D. & Mueller, Bernardo, 2000. "Land Reform Policies, the Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 162-188, March.
    8. Alston, Lee J & Libecap, Gary D & Schneider, Robert, 1996. "The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights: Land Titles on the Brazilian Frontier," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 25-61, April.
    9. Edward B. Barbier, 2004. "Explaining Agricultural Land Expansion and Deforestation in Developing Countries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(5), pages 1347-1353.
    10. Andersen,Lykke E. & Granger,Clive W. J. & Reis,Eustaquio J. & Weinhold,Diana & Wunder,Sven, 2002. "The Dynamics of Deforestation and Economic Growth in the Brazilian Amazon," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521811972, March.
    11. Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig, 2003. "Economic Growth and the Rise of Forests," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 118(2), pages 601-637.
    12. Angelsen, Arild, 1999. "Agricultural expansion and deforestation: modelling the impact of population, market forces and property rights," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 185-218, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:108919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.