IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/sbrfsr/108917.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impactos Da Estrutura Empresarial, Agricultura E Pecuária Sobre O Pib Per Capita: Uma Abordagem Espacial No Estado Do Acre

Author

Listed:
  • Silveira, Breno Carrillo
  • Silva, Rubicleis Gomes Da
  • Silveira, Aurilene Oliveira De Araujo

Abstract

Em 2004, o Acre possuía um Produto Interno Bruto (PIB) igual a R$ 3.241.847.000,00, com PIB per capita igual a R$ 5.143,00. Segundo dados do IBGE, os valores adicionados ao PIB na agropecuária, na indústria e no serviço, foram respectivamente de R$ 179.312.000,00; R$ 853.043.000,00 e R$ 1.999.670.000,00. Nesse contexto, torna-se relevante saber como as atividades econômicas impactam sobre a formação do PIB per capita nos municípios acreanos. Diante disso, a análise do impacto causado pela presença de unidades empresariais, pela pecuária e pela produção agrícola sobre o PIB per capita dos municípios possibilita uma visão da própria economia do estado. A teoria da externalidade é utilizada para referenciar esta pesquisa. Analiticamente, é utilizada a análise exploratória de dados espaciais. Os resultados mostram que em alguns municípios acreanos o PIB per capita é fortemente impactado pela pecuária e agricultura praticadas em seus vizinhos. Em relação à quantidade de unidades empresariais em um município, verificou-se que essa variável, neste modelo, não impacta sobre o PIB per capita nos municípios vizinhos contíguos. -------------------------------------------In 2004, the Acre had a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) equal to $ 3.241.847.000,00, with per capita GDP equal to $ 5.143,00. According to the IBGE, the figures added to the GDP in agriculture, industry and service, were respectively of $ 179.312.000,00; $ 853.043.000,00 and $ 1.999.670.000,00. In this context, it is important to know how the economic activities impact on the training of GDP per capita in the municipalities of Acre. Given that, the analysis of the impact caused by the presence of business units, the livestock and agricultural production on the GDP per capita of municipalities allows a vision of the economy of the state. The theory of externalities is used to refer this search. Analytically, is used exploratory analysis of spatial data. The results show that in some municipalities of Acre GDP per capita is strongly impacted by the livestock and agriculture practiced in its neighbours. In relation to the amount of business units in a municipality, it was found that this variable, in this model, no impact on GDP per capita in neighboring counties contiguous.

Suggested Citation

  • Silveira, Breno Carrillo & Silva, Rubicleis Gomes Da & Silveira, Aurilene Oliveira De Araujo, 2008. "Impactos Da Estrutura Empresarial, Agricultura E Pecuária Sobre O Pib Per Capita: Uma Abordagem Espacial No Estado Do Acre," 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil 108917, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:108917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/108917
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward B. Barbier, 2001. "The Economics of Tropical Deforestation and Land Use: An Introduction to the Special Issue," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(2), pages 155-171.
    2. Baland, Jean-Marie & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2000. "Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities?," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198290612.
    3. Robert T. Deacon, 1994. "Deforestation and the Rule of Law in a Cross-Section of Countries," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 70(4), pages 414-430.
    4. Steve Dowrick, 1986. "von Stackelberg and Cournot Duopoly: Choosing Roles," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(2), pages 251-260, Summer.
    5. Bhattarai, Madhusudan & Hammig, Michael, 2004. "Governance, economic policy, and the environmental Kuznets curve for natural tropical forests," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(03), pages 367-382, July.
    6. Gal-Or, Esther, 1985. "First Mover and Second Mover Advantages," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 26(3), pages 649-653, October.
    7. Alston, Lee J. & Libecap, Gary D. & Mueller, Bernardo, 2000. "Land Reform Policies, the Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 162-188, March.
    8. Alston, Lee J & Libecap, Gary D & Schneider, Robert, 1996. "The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights: Land Titles on the Brazilian Frontier," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 25-61, April.
    9. Edward B. Barbier, 2004. "Explaining Agricultural Land Expansion and Deforestation in Developing Countries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(5), pages 1347-1353.
    10. Andersen,Lykke E. & Granger,Clive W. J. & Reis,Eustaquio J. & Weinhold,Diana & Wunder,Sven, 2002. "The Dynamics of Deforestation and Economic Growth in the Brazilian Amazon," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521811972, March.
    11. Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig, 2003. "Economic Growth and the Rise of Forests," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 118(2), pages 601-637.
    12. Angelsen, Arild, 1999. "Agricultural expansion and deforestation: modelling the impact of population, market forces and property rights," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 185-218, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:108917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/soberea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.