IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/sbrfsr/108636.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Aspectos Nacionais E Regionais Do Crescimento Da Produção Brasileira De Cana-De-Açúcar

Author

Listed:
  • Satolo, Luiz Fernando
  • Diehl, Daiane

Abstract

O cultivo da cana-de-açúcar tem apresentado um expressivo crescimento ao longo de todo o território nacional, com destaque para a região Centro-Sul. O objetivo desse estudo é investigar como aspectos regionais (ou seja, a adoção de inovações tecnológicas) – representados pela evolução da produtividade nos principais Estados produtores – e nacionais (ou seja, as condições de mercado) – representados pela evolução do preço médio de açúcar e álcool – têm contribuído para a expansão da agroindústria canavieira no Brasil. A oferta dos 10 Estados brasileiros com maior produção de cana-de-açúcar foi estimada através de um modelo de regressões aparentemente não-relacionadas (SUR). Os dados anuais abrangeram as safras de 1990/91 a 2004/05. Exceto por Pernambuco e Mato Grosso, a evolução da produção de cana-de-açúcar nos Estados analisados não apresentou uma relação significativa com o nível de preço de açúcar e álcool. Entretanto, a influência da produtividade foi significativa em todos os Estados. De acordo com os resultados estimados, aumentos de produtividade em Alagoas, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Mato Grosso e Goiás podem levar a um aumento mais que proporcional da produção; já em São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro e Mato Grosso do Sul, os ganhos na produção podem ser menos que proporcionais. De qualquer forma, pôde-se concluir que aspectos regionais têm sido mais importantes que os nacionais para explicar o crescimento recente da produção canavieira no Brasil.---------------------------------------------Sugar cane crop has recently presented an expressive growth throughout Brazil, mainly in the Center-South region. The objective of this paper is to investigate how regional factors (i.e., the adoption of technogical innovations) – represented by the evolution of sugar cane yield in the main producer States – and national factors (i.e., market conditions) – represented by the evolution of sugar and ethanol average price – has contributed for the expansion of cane production in Brazil. Sugar cane production in the top 10 Brazilian producer States was estimated through a Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) model. The annual data covered the period between the crops of 1990/91 and 2004/05. Besides Pernambuco and Mato Grosso, the evolution of sugar cane production in the States analyzed didn’t present a significant relation with the sugar and ethanol price level. However, the yield influence was significant in all States. According to the results, yield increments in Alagoas, Paraiba, Pernambuco, Minas Gerais, Parana, Mato Grosso e Goias may lead to a more than proportional increase in production; but in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Mato Grosso do Sul, those gains may be less than proportional. On either way, the regional factors has been the more important than the national ones to explain the recent developments on sugar cane production in Brazil.

Suggested Citation

  • Satolo, Luiz Fernando & Diehl, Daiane, 2008. "Aspectos Nacionais E Regionais Do Crescimento Da Produção Brasileira De Cana-De-Açúcar," 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil 108636, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:108636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/108636
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward B. Barbier, 2001. "The Economics of Tropical Deforestation and Land Use: An Introduction to the Special Issue," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(2), pages 155-171.
    2. Baland, Jean-Marie & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2000. "Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities?," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198290612.
    3. Robert T. Deacon, 1994. "Deforestation and the Rule of Law in a Cross-Section of Countries," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 70(4), pages 414-430.
    4. Steve Dowrick, 1986. "von Stackelberg and Cournot Duopoly: Choosing Roles," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(2), pages 251-260, Summer.
    5. Bhattarai, Madhusudan & Hammig, Michael, 2004. "Governance, economic policy, and the environmental Kuznets curve for natural tropical forests," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(03), pages 367-382, July.
    6. Gal-Or, Esther, 1985. "First Mover and Second Mover Advantages," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 26(3), pages 649-653, October.
    7. Alston, Lee J. & Libecap, Gary D. & Mueller, Bernardo, 2000. "Land Reform Policies, the Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 162-188, March.
    8. Alston, Lee J & Libecap, Gary D & Schneider, Robert, 1996. "The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights: Land Titles on the Brazilian Frontier," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 25-61, April.
    9. Edward B. Barbier, 2004. "Explaining Agricultural Land Expansion and Deforestation in Developing Countries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(5), pages 1347-1353.
    10. Andersen,Lykke E. & Granger,Clive W. J. & Reis,Eustaquio J. & Weinhold,Diana & Wunder,Sven, 2002. "The Dynamics of Deforestation and Economic Growth in the Brazilian Amazon," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521811972, March.
    11. Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig, 2003. "Economic Growth and the Rise of Forests," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 118(2), pages 601-637.
    12. Angelsen, Arild, 1999. "Agricultural expansion and deforestation: modelling the impact of population, market forces and property rights," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 185-218, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:108636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/soberea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.