IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea13/142982.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of Financial Performance of U.S. Hog Farms Using a DuPont Expansion: Is there a Future for Independent Hog Producers?

Author

Listed:
  • Nehring, Richard F.
  • Gillespie, Jeffrey M.
  • Harris, Michael
  • Hallahan, Charles B.
  • Erickson, Kenneth W.
  • Leibold, Kelvin

Abstract

US swine production has undergone significant structural change in the last two decades, reflecting increasing size and specialization (Key and McBride; Key). In particular, the widespread use of contracting has enabled individual producers to grow by specializing in a single phase of production. Once dominated by small operations that practiced crop and hog farming along with other livestock enterprises, the industry has increasingly concentrated among large operations in most regions that produce hogs on several different sites (especially in North Carolina). Survey results for 2008-2011 indicate that some independent hog producers remain competitive, suggesting the rate of sharp decline in independent hog production that took place between 1992 and 2004 may have slowed. In future research we will sort on DuPont results more thoroughly to account for differences in organizational arrangement—whether farrowing or not---as production contracts tend to be much more prevalent on finish operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nehring, Richard F. & Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Harris, Michael & Hallahan, Charles B. & Erickson, Kenneth W. & Leibold, Kelvin, 2013. "Analysis of Financial Performance of U.S. Hog Farms Using a DuPont Expansion: Is there a Future for Independent Hog Producers?," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 142982, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea13:142982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/142982
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    hogs; contract; DuPont; Farm Management; Financial Economics; Productivity Analysis;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea13:142982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.