IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/quedwp/274730.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wild Bootstrap Randomization Inference for Few Treated Clusters

Author

Listed:
  • MacKinnon, James G.
  • Webb, Matthew D.

Abstract

When there are few treated clusters in a pure treatment or difference-in-differences setting, t tests based on a cluster-robust variance estimator (CRVE) can severely over- reject. Although procedures based on the wild cluster bootstrap often work well when the number of treated clusters is not too small, they can either over-reject or under- reject seriously when it is. In a previous paper, we showed that procedures based on randomization inference (RI) can work well in such cases. However, RI can be imprac- tical when the number of clusters is small. We propose a bootstrap-based alternative to randomization inference, which mitigates the discrete nature of RI P values in the few-clusters case.

Suggested Citation

  • MacKinnon, James G. & Webb, Matthew D., 2018. "Wild Bootstrap Randomization Inference for Few Treated Clusters," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 274730, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274730
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274730/files/qed_wp_1404.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.