Author
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the asymmetric pure strategy equilibria in a dynamic game of pure information externality. Each player receives a private signal and chooses whether and when to invest. In some of the periods, only a subgroup of the players make decisions, which we call bunching, while the rest of the players do not invest regardless of their signals. Bunching is di¤erent from herding; it occurs in the rst period and recursively until herd- ing takes place or the game runs out of undecided players. We nd that any asymmetric pure strategy equilibrium is more e¢ cient than the symmetric mixed strategy equilibrium. When players become patient enough, herding of investment disappears in the most e¢ cient asymmetric pure strategy equilibrium, while the least e¢ cient asymmetric pure strategy equilibrium resembles those in a xed timing model, producing an exact match when the discount factor is equal to 1. Bunch sizes are shown to be independent of the total num- ber of players; adding more players to the game need not change early playersbehavior. All these are unique properties of the asymmetric pure strategy equilibria. We also show that the asymmetric pure strategy equilibria can accommodate small heterogeneities of the players in costs of acquiring signals, discount factors, or degree of risk aversion. In any of these environments, there exists a unique welfare maximizing equilibrium which provides a natural way for the players to coordinate.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Tao, 2011.
"Dynamic Equilibrium Bunching,"
Queen's Economics Department Working Papers
274611, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:quedwp:274611
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274611
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.