IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333069.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Potential Investment Facilitation Agreement: Possible Scenarios and Their Impact on Countries’ Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Berger, Axel
  • Dadkhah, Ali
  • Olekseyuk, Zoryana

Abstract

Investment facilitation covers a wide range of areas, all with the ultimate focus on allowing investment to flow efficiently and for the greatest benefit. International discussions on investment facilitation have been very dynamic. Since the idea of an investment facilitation agreement (IFA) was proposed by a group of experts in 2015, it was pursued in the G20 and discussed among the World Trade Organization (WTO) members. In this study we map the legal commitments in potential IFAs onto an index that measures investment facilitation developed by the German Development Institute (DIE), namely Investment Facilitation Index (IFI). Hereby, we create different scenarios for the potential multilateral investment facilitation framework. We start with a lower bound IFA, which includes investment facilitation commitments covered by different free trade agreements (e.g., CETA, CPTPP, NAFTA), and proceed with an ambitious IFA, which covers investment facilitation measures mentioned in all available proposals submitted to the WTO. Moreover, we also take into account a broader set of countries expanding the current list of 69 participants of the Structured Discussions at the WTO with India and the USA. This analysis contributes to the very scarce research on investment facilitation and informs policymakers about potential changes in countries’ rules and regulations due to the multilateral IFA currently discussed among the WTO members. The results illustrate which commitments represent a common ground and can be easily negotiated given currently implemented measures by a large number of participating countries. Moreover, we demonstrate which IFA framework is the most beneficial for participants due to the highest reform potential. In addition, we investigate the differences in reform burden and expected improvements for different country groups, e.g., developed vs. developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Berger, Axel & Dadkhah, Ali & Olekseyuk, Zoryana, 2019. "Potential Investment Facilitation Agreement: Possible Scenarios and Their Impact on Countries’ Regulations," Conference papers 333069, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333069/files/9293.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Axel & Gsell, Sebastian & Olekseyuk, Zoryana, 2019. "Investment facilitation for development: a new route to global investment governance," Briefing Papers 5/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berger, Axel & Dadkhah, Ali & Olekseyuk, Zoryana, 2021. "Quantifying investment facilitation at country level: Introducing a new index," IDOS Discussion Papers 23/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Berger, Axel & Dadkhah, Ali & Olekseyuk, Zoryana, 2019. "Potential Investment Facilitation Agreement: Possible Scenarios and Their Impact on Countries’ Regulations," Conference papers 333076, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.