IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331450.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Trade Liberalisation Leave Women Behind in South Africa: A Gendered CGE Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fofana, I.
  • Cockburn, J.
  • Decaluwe, B.
  • Mabugu, R.
  • Chitiga, M.

Abstract

Despite the general presumption in favor of trade liberalization, the question of how to implement it in a way to ensure equitable income distribution and sustainable poverty alleviation in developing countries is at the core of the current trade debate. We build a macroeconomic framework that integrates both market and non-market activities, while distinguishing male and female workers throughout, in order to evaluate impacts of tariffs elimination on the well-being of men and women in South Africa. Our study reveals a strong gender bias against women with a decrease in their labor market participation, while men participate more in the market economy. This strong result is due to the fact that female workers are concentrated in contracting sectors which were initially among the protected sectors, and which benefit little from the fall in input prices. In contrast, male workers are more concentrated in the expanding export-intensive sectors. Female market participation drops particularly for black African women, as they are more concentrated in contracting female-intensive sectors. As male labor market participation and real wages increase more than for their female counterparts, their income share increases within the household. This is likely to reduce the bargaining power of women in their households although this is not modeled explicitly in this study. Women will continue to suffer from heavy time burden within the households with trade liberalization. Therefore, Government should design complementary fiscal policies to reduce the time burden of women through measures promoting the consumption of time saving technologies and improving their productivity, and to increase female market participation and employment to ensure equitable income distribution among men and women, thus contributing to poverty reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Fofana, I. & Cockburn, J. & Decaluwe, B. & Mabugu, R. & Chitiga, M., 2006. "Does Trade Liberalisation Leave Women Behind in South Africa: A Gendered CGE Analysis," Conference papers 331450, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331450/files/2503.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.