IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331436.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Doha Merchandise Trade Reform and Developing Countries: What’s at Stake?

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson, Kym
  • Martin, Will
  • van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique

Abstract

This paper provides new estimates of the global gains from multilateral trade reform and their distribution, in the presence of trade preferences, among developing countries. Particular attention is given to agriculture, as farmers constitute the poorest households in developing countries but the most protected in rich countries. The latest GTAP database (Version 6.04) and the World Bank’s LINKAGE model of the global economy are employed to examine the impact first of current merchandise trade barriers and agricultural subsidies, and then of possible outcomes from the WTO’s Doha round. The results suggest moving to free global merchandise trade would boost real incomes in SubSaharan Africa proportionately more than in other developing countries or high-income countries, despite a terms of trade loss in parts of that region. Farm employment, the real value of agricultural output and exports, the real returns to farm land and unskilled labor, and real net farm incomes would all rise substantially in that and other developing country regions, thereby alleviating rural poverty. A Doha partial liberalization could take it some way towards those desirable outcomes, but more so the more developing countries themselves cut applied tariffs, particularly on agricultural imports.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, Kym & Martin, Will & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2005. "Doha Merchandise Trade Reform and Developing Countries: What’s at Stake?," Conference papers 331436, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331436/files/2144.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.