IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/330248.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is the European climate policy a jab against an oil shock? A CGE analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Saveyn, Bert
  • Pycroft, Jonathan
  • Maisonnave, Helene
  • Ciscar, Juan Carlos

Abstract

The European Union has committed itself to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 20% in 2020 compared with 1990 levels. A number of studies have analyzed the impact of these policies for the EU economy and the competitiveness of its industries. However, few studies have looked to the possible benefits of the EU climate policy in terms of energy‐security, and more particular to the interaction between high oil prices and climate policy. In this paper, we try to evaluate the extent to which a climate policy protects Europe from an oil price rise. We use the GEM‐E3 model to analyze the results of three scenarios. The first one refers to the impact of an increase in the oil price. The second scenario analyses the European climate policy and finally, the third scenario analyses the oil shock when the European climate policy is implemented. We find that in the first scenario, the oil price rise reduces emissions significantly, and all the countries suffer economically. In the second scenario, the European economic slowdown has impacts on its trade partners. The last scenario, finds that Europe suffers less from the oil shock if a climate policy is implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Saveyn, Bert & Pycroft, Jonathan & Maisonnave, Helene & Ciscar, Juan Carlos, 2010. "Is the European climate policy a jab against an oil shock? A CGE analysis," Conference papers 330248, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330248/files/5393_Saveyn.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.