IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/330165.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving the Representation of Public Procurement in the GTAP Framework

Author

Abstract

Overview In 2012, €352 billion of the €420 billion EU public procurement budget was open to member countries of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA). This represents 85% openness for the EU, which contrasts with the value of other GPA members such as the USA, whose level of public procurement offered to foreign bidders was of approximately €178 billion of €556.25 billion (32%) and for Japan where the open procurement figures were about €27 billion of the €96.4 billion (28%). Given the large, and growing, size of these public expenditures, access by potential foreign suppliers has become increasingly important. Yet the analytical tools used to quantify the impact of restrictive public procurement decisions remain woefully underdeveloped. This paper reports on a project, being undertaken by the Center for Global Trade Analysis and collaborators, aimed at improving the representation of public procurement in the GTAP data base and modelling framework. The Nature of the Challenge Due to the fact that any public procurement agreements will involve multiple countries, purchasing a wide range of goods and services, supplied by many different regions, this question is best addressed in a multi-region, general equilibrium framework. Yet the scope for global CGE modelling of any new issue, such as public procurement, is inevitably limited by data. If current purchases cannot be separately identified in the data, then there is little hope of estimating the likely impact of liberalization. Currently most global CGE models rely, directly or indirectly on the GTAP Data Base (Narayanan, Aguiar and McDougall, 2012). Unfortunately, the current structure of GTAP poses serious limitations when it comes to analysing public procurement. There are several key limitations which deserve special mention. First of all, it is likely that the current data base does not accurately capture the mix of domestic and imported goods which are purchased by governments. T...

Suggested Citation

  • Aguiar, Angel, 2014. "Improving the Representation of Public Procurement in the GTAP Framework," Conference papers 330165, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330165/files/6992_Aguiar.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.