Author
Listed:
- Mosse, David
- KRIBP project team
Abstract
For reasons of efficiency, equity and sustainability (among others) participatory approaches to planning are now accepted as necessary in public systems of rural development as well as among the NGOs who pioneered them. Yet, there are signcant social and institutional constraints to people's participation in planning, which this paper examines. The first issue concerns the relationship between local knowledge, for example that generated through PRA methods, and programme decision-making. The paper suggests that enhancing local people's role in knowledge production does not in itself remove obstacles to their role, or the influence of their perspectives, in programme planning. It shows that local knowledge production and use is determined by planning systems. These involve divergent agendas and negotiated compromises between local needs and project objectives and also have to meet wider organisational demands. The second issue concerns the difficulties of sustaining participation from the planning stage through into implementation to ensure long-term local commitment to project innovations. The paper points out the need to identify the social conditions for sustained participation within rural development projects. Two responses to the difficulties of participatory planning are described. The first is to build into projects the ability to analyse and interpret problems, needs and priorities as social constructs. The second is to identify appropriate social contexts (local groups) for planning and sustainability. Finally, the paper suggests some problems in the transfer of rigorous group-based participatory planning approaches between different institutional contexts.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ovdeia:295969
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.295969
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ovdeia:295969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.