Author
Abstract
The project "Conservation for Sustainable Development in Central America", known as Olafo, at the Tropical Agriculture Research and Training Centre (CATIE) seeks to promote the sustainable use of local biological diversity by rural groups established in agricultural frontier zones in four Central American countries. A comparison of strategies employed in communities in Guatemala, Costa Rica and Panama shows that: i) systems analysis, as a conceptual framework, can be used to simultaneously consider development and conservation, two goals often considered contradictory; the formation of interdisciplinary teams provides opportunities to demystify technical issues by reconciling the perspectives of both the technicians and the communities; ii) the reinforcement and capacity-building of community organisations should be included as an objective not only to satisfy the basic development needs of a community, but also to provide skills to negotiate with different institutions — both private and public — on technical assistance and policy issues such as land tenure; iii) national institutions, contrary to general opinion, cannot, in the short term, allow for the continuation of these types of activities; iv) a working strategy at the community level should consider: • the identification of problems through existing formal local organisations as well as more informal family groups; the basic need of the local population for the intervention of external agents (e.g. technicians, NGOs and other non-local institutions); • the need for both technical and organisational training at a local level; • the identification of formal, informal and potential leaders within a community.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ovdeia:295958
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.295958
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ovdeia:295958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.