IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr12/207084.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is the Decision to Code-share a Route Different for Virtual versus Traditional Code-Share Arrangements?

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Yan
  • McMullen, Starr

Abstract

This paper analyzes factors that determine whether individual routes remain in or leave a code-share agreement in different scenarios: pooled, purely traditionally code-shared routes, purely virtual code-shared routes and routes both traditionally and purely codeshare. The code-share alliance between Continental and America West Airlines is used as the case study for this analysis. Empirical results show that factors affecting alliance firms’ code sharing decision significantly differ for virtual versus traditional code share agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Yan & McMullen, Starr, 2012. "Is the Decision to Code-share a Route Different for Virtual versus Traditional Code-Share Arrangements?," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207084, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr12:207084
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207084/files/2012_40_Code_Share_Virtual_Traditional.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr12:207084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.