IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr10/207277.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Variations in the rates of passenger usage of portable Technology on intercity buses, trains and planes: Implications for transportation planning

Author

Listed:
  • Schwieterman, Joseph P.

Abstract

Over the past several years, the use of portable electronic devices by passengers on intercity transportation services has risen markedly. To support the use of such devices, carriers have installed Wi-Fi systems, power outlets, and cell-phone signal boosters for passenger use. To fill a void in research about the effects of portable electronic technology on intercity travel behavior, this study evaluates newly collected data for 7,028 passengers on bus, train, and air trips. It explores how usage differs by mode and time of day, as well as the implications that these differences have on various sectors of the U.S. transportation system. Field researchers conducted visual surveys to measure the use of two basic types of devices: (1) those providing audio capability, such as cell phones, CD players, and digital music systems, and (2) those providing visual or audiovisual capacity, such as laptop computers, Blackberries and other high-end smart phones, DVD players, and I-Pods with screens. The data collection involved field observations in 14 states as well as the District of Columbia. The data suggests that the ability to use portable technology may be a driving force in the growth of “curbside” bus operators that are Wi-Fi equipped, such as Boltbus and Megabus. Twenty minutes into a trip, 38.7% of passengers are using some form of technology—twice the share of Greyhound, three percentage points more than on conventional Amtrak trains, and twenty percentage points more than airlines. Portable technology use on weekday runs of Amtrak’s high-speed Acela Express, however, is even higher. An average, 47.8% of passengers on these trips are using technology at randomly selected points. On both Acela and conventional Amtrak trains, where the seating configuration is relatively spacious, passengers tend to use visual devices with LCD screens. On curbside bus operations, however, there is an almost equal mix of audio activities and visual/LCD-screen related activities. Interpreted broadly, the research suggests that the ability to use portable electronics may be a factor offsetting the longer travel times associated with certain bus and train trips, and providing a new incentive for travelers to use transportation services that operate to and from the downtown areas of major cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwieterman, Joseph P., 2010. "Variations in the rates of passenger usage of portable Technology on intercity buses, trains and planes: Implications for transportation planning," 51st Annual Transportation Research Forum, Arlington, Virginia, March 11-13, 2010 207277, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207277
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207277/files/2010_157_Passenger_Rates_Portable_Technology.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2001. "Impacts of Information Technology on Personal Tavel and Commercial Vehicle Operations: Research Challenges and Opportunities," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt95r7j7vk, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aguiléra, Anne & Guillot, Caroline & Rallet, Alain, 2012. "Mobile ICTs and physical mobility: Review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 664-672.
    2. Ni, Linglin & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Zhang, Dapeng, 2016. "Impacts of information technology and urbanization on less-than-truckload freight flows in China: An analysis considering spatial effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 12-25.
    3. Park, Minyoung & Regan, Amelia, 2004. "Issues in Emerging Home Delivery Operations," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3754142p, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Weltevreden, Jesse W.J. & Rotem-Mindali, Orit, 2009. "Mobility effects of b2c and c2c e-commerce in the Netherlands: a quantitative assessment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 83-92.
    5. Choo, Sangho, 2003. "Aggregate Relationships between Telecommunications and Travel: Structural Equation Modeling of Time Series Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4p78h623, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Shaw, Shih-Lung & Yu, Hongbo, 2009. "A GIS-based time-geographic approach of studying individual activities and interactions in a hybrid physical–virtual space," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 141-149.
    7. Guido Schwarz, 2006. "Enabling Global Trade above the Clouds: Restructuring Processes and Information Technology in the Transatlantic Air-Cargo Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(8), pages 1463-1485, August.
    8. Rotem-Mindali, Orit, 2010. "E-tail versus retail: The effects on shopping related travel empirical evidence from Israel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 312-322, September.
    9. Shi, Yuji & Blainey, Simon & Sun, Chao & Jing, Peng, 2020. "A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Mondschein, Andrew Samuel, 2013. "The Personal City: The Experiential, Cognitive Nature of Travel and Activity and Implications for Accessibility," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7014d9cg, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Lyons, Glenn, 2002. "Internet: investigating new technology's evolving role, nature and effects on transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 335-346, October.
    12. Pawlak, Jacek & Polak, John W. & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2015. "Towards a microeconomic framework for modelling the joint choice of activity–travel behaviour and ICT use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 92-112.
    13. De Borger, Bruno & Wuyts, Bart, 2011. "The structure of the labor market, telecommuting, and optimal peak period congestion tolls: A numerical optimization model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 426-438, September.
    14. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2001. "The Perceived Usefulness of Different Sources of Traffic Information to Trucking Operations," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7wz0j3rm, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Velaga, Nagendra R. & Beecroft, Mark & Nelson, John D. & Corsar, David & Edwards, Peter, 2012. "Transport poverty meets the digital divide: accessibility and connectivity in rural communities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 102-112.
    16. Aiyegbajeje Femi Ola & Ajayi Dickson Dare, 2018. "Mobile Communications, physical distance and access to follow-up healthcare service in Lagos Metropolis," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 42(42), pages 7-18, December.
    17. Sergey M. Plaksin & Alexander S. Kondrashov & Elizaveta V. Yastrebova & Ekaterina M. Reshetova & Nikita A. Krupenskiy, 2015. "The Pros and Cons of the Intelligent Transportation System Implementation at Toll Plazas in Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 02/URB/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    18. Evert‐Jan Visser & Martin Lanzendorf, 2004. "Mobility And Accessibility Effects Of B2c E‐Commerce: A Literature Review," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(2), pages 189-205, April.
    19. Orit Rotem-Mindali & Ilan Salomon, 2009. "Modeling Consumers' Purchase and Delivery Choices in the Face of the Information Age," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(2), pages 245-261, April.
    20. Matous, Petr, 2017. "Complementarity and substitution between physical and virtual travel for instrumental information sharing in remote rural regions: A social network approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 61-79.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.