IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr09/207613.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Toward the Betterment of Risk Allocation: Investigating Risk Perceptions of Australian Stakeholder Groups to Public-Private-Partnership Tollroad Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Chung, Demi

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative assessment of the risk perceptions held by key Australian stakeholder groups in the context of tollroads operated under the Public-Private-Partnership model. The findings confirm that experience accumulated in recent years has contributed toward the betterment of risk sharing optimisation amongst the contracting parties. The knowledge acquired through in-depth interviews supports the common view that equitable risk-sharing is the vital ingredient of value for money. The proposition that the private sector is better equipped to manage commercial risks involving economic decision making whilst risks that have embedded unquantifiable social and public values and those in the domain of public governance are best left with government alone, appears to be replete with refutable implications. Public perception is a malleable concept and should be managed by both sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung, Demi, 2009. "Toward the Betterment of Risk Allocation: Investigating Risk Perceptions of Australian Stakeholder Groups to Public-Private-Partnership Tollroad Projects," 50th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Portland, Oregon, March 16-18, 2009 207613, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr09:207613
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207613/files/2009_51_RiskAllocation_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr09:207613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.