IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndsuag/358893.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Potential Costs to Agricultural Exporters of Section 301 Annex 1 and 2 Fees

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Jiyeon
  • Gammans, Matthew
  • Arita, Shawn
  • Steinbach, Sandro

Abstract

On April 17, 2025, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) finalized a Section 301 action targeting China’s dominance in shipbuilding and maritime logistics by imposing new port fees on Chinese-operated (Annex 1) and Chinese-built (Annex 2) vessels arriving at U.S. ports. This white paper evaluates the implications of these fees for U.S. agricultural exports, using 2024 data on port calls and vessel characteristics. We simulate the counterfactual costs that would have been incurred under the final policy, finding that, absent shifts in routing or vessel choice, annual shipping costs could initially rise by $2.3 billion and escalate to $6.2 billion by 2028. For major commodities such as corn, wheat, and soybeans, the added fees translate to an estimated 5 to 7 cents per bushel.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Jiyeon & Gammans, Matthew & Arita, Shawn & Steinbach, Sandro, 2025. "Assessing the Potential Costs to Agricultural Exporters of Section 301 Annex 1 and 2 Fees," Agricultural Risk Policy Center 358893, North Dakota State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndsuag:358893
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.358893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358893/files/ARPC%20White%20Paper%202025-02_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.358893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndsuag:358893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.