IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaae/55120.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Grain Contracting Strategies: The Case of Durum Wheat (Summary)

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson, William W.
  • Dahl, Bruce L.

Abstract

One of the impacts of higher prices along with greater volatility in futures, basis and spreads is that there is pressure for greater use of cash contracts for grain. Indeed there has been growth in contracting for a number of competing crops in recent years. There is a wide array of cash contracts with varying terms that pose major strategic alternatives for buyers and the marketing system, particularly as buyers seek to use contracting as an element of risk mitigation. Durum is a crop where many of these issues and challenges are apparent. Durum is more risky than competing crops. There is greater price and yield risk as well as quality risk, and in contrast to competing crops, futures do not exist, cross hedging is poor and forward contracting has been used minimally. There are three purposes of this paper: First, we provide a survey of contract terms used in grain contracting with growers. Second, we illustrate some issues in contracting of some of the specialty grains (durum) in the upper Midwest. Finally, we develop a model to analyze alternative contracting strategies in the case of durum. We introduce alternative pricing features, as well as explore other alternatives and analyze them in terms of risk and return to growers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2009. "Grain Contracting Strategies: The Case of Durum Wheat (Summary)," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 55120, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:55120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/55120
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:55120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.