IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaae/190589.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Results Of The North Dakota Land Valuation Model For The 2014 Agricultural Real Estate Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Aakre, Dwight G.
  • Haugen, Ronald

Abstract

This report summarizes the 2014 results of the North Dakota Land Valuation Model. The model is used annually to estimate average land values by county, based on the value of production from cropland and non-cropland. The county land values developed from this procedure form the basis for the 2014 valuation of agricultural land for real estate tax assessment. The average value for all agricultural land in a county from this analysis is multiplied by the total acres of agricultural land on the county abstract to determine each county’s total agricultural land value for taxation purposes. The State Board of Equalization compares this value with the total value assessed to agricultural property in each county. The average value per acre of all agricultural land in North Dakota increased by 12.41 percent from 2013 to 2014 based on the value of production. Cropland value increased 12.67 percent, and non-cropland value increased by 4.38 percent. The formula capitalization rate was 5.19 percent. The capitalization rate used for all years from 2003 through 2011 was the minimum rate set by the Legislature. The legislation setting a minimum capitalization rate expired after the 2011 tax year. The increase in the values for cropland and all agricultural land was primarily due to increased value of crop production. The value of production for most counties has been considerably higher since 2007 than prior years. This increase in value of production is a combination of increased yields, higher prices and a change in cropping mix. The capitalization rate change increased land valuations by 5.74 percent in all counties; while the cost of production index decreased land values in all counties by 6.289 percent. The value of production increased cropland valuation between 4.45 percent up to 15.7 percent across individual counties. Non-cropland values increased by 4.38 percent, all due to an increase in the price received for calves and cull cows. Changes in market value are included for comparison. Market value data are from the annual County Rents and Values survey conducted by North Dakota Agricultural Statistics Service.

Suggested Citation

  • Aakre, Dwight G. & Haugen, Ronald, 2014. "Results Of The North Dakota Land Valuation Model For The 2014 Agricultural Real Estate Assessment," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 190589, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:190589
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.190589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/190589/files/AAE733.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.190589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coon, Randal C. & Olson, Frayne & Bangsund, Dean A. & Hodur, Nancy M., 2015. "Contribution of the Pulse Crop Industry to the Economies of North Dakota and Eastern Montana," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 231252, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:190589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.