Author
Listed:
- Chandio, Rabail
- Katchova, Ani
Abstract
USDA’s annual Agricultural Baseline Projections contribute significantly to agricultural policy in the United States, and hence their accuracy is vital. The baseline projections present a neutral policy scenario assuming a specific macroeconomic situation and allow the analyses of alternative policies and their micro and macroeconomic impacts in the United States. We investigate the trends and heterogeneity in the incidence of bias in the USDA International Baseline Projection reports from 2002 to 2021. The evaluation of bias as it varies geographically, temporally, and by crop-variable allows us to make inferential judgments about the sources of this bias. First, we use the dynamic time warping algorithm to examine whether experts tend to group together the projections for certain crops across different countries, producing similar projection trends. We find that projection series for all countries in the sample are correlated with the United States in their trends. Second, we compute the bias in projections and decompose it by projection horizon. Third, we assess whether the bias is higher across crops or across countries with more substantial evidence for grouping behavior and find that for soybeans imports, soybeans ending stocks, and wheat area harvested, similarity in projection trends with the United States lowers the bias while for most other crop-variables it increases it. This suggests that the projections for our sample countries are unnecessarily made to follow similar trends to the United States projections which proves to be a bias inducing choice in most cases.
Suggested Citation
Chandio, Rabail & Katchova, Ani, 2022.
"Herding in the USDA International Baseline Projections,"
2022 Conference, April 25-26, 2022, St. Louis, Missouri
329784, NCR-134/ NCCC-134 Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:nccc22:329784
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329784
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nccc22:329784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.