IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nccc11/285343.html

Oligopsony Fed Cattle Pricing: _x000B_Did Mandatory Price Reporting Increase Meatpacker Market Power?

Author

Listed:
  • Cai, Xiaowei
  • Stiegert, Kyle W.
  • Koontz, Stephen R.

Abstract

The Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting Act became law in April 2001 with the intent to provide more transparent market information to cattle producers. A criticism of mandatory price reporting (MPR) is that the increased price transparency may actually increase oligopsony power exercised by beef packers. We examine beefpacking margins using time periods before and after MPR was implemented with a Markov model that tests for switching between cooperative and noncooperative pricing. Switching is indicative of noncompetitive conduct and we examine the duration and magnitude of market power. One key finding is that market power is two times higher after MPR than before. The second is that, while this study produces some of the largest measures of market power associated with fed cattle pricing, market power remains rather small and is consistent with prior research. Last, we offer the caveat that there is more occurring in fed cattle and beef markets during last 20 year than the transition from voluntary to mandatory price reporting. So MPR is likely not the only cause of increased market power. But there is clearly more market power exercised in fed cattle markets after 2001 than before.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai, Xiaowei & Stiegert, Kyle W. & Koontz, Stephen R., 2011. "Oligopsony Fed Cattle Pricing: _x000B_Did Mandatory Price Reporting Increase Meatpacker Market Power?," 2011 Conference, April 18-19, 2011, St. Louis, Missouri 285343, NCR-134/ NCCC-134 Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nccc11:285343
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/285343/files/confp24-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.285343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nccc11:285343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.