IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nc8191/285756.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hog Profit Margin Hedging: A Long-Term Out-of-Sample Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Kee, Gary D.
  • Kenyon, David E.

Abstract

This paper is long-term evaluation of the profit margin hedging strategy suggested by Kenyon and Clay. To implement this strategy an expected profit margin is estimated based on the amount of pork, corn price, and soybean meal price. Additionally, the profit margin that can be "locked in" by the futures market is calculated from the futures prices of live hogs, corn and soybean meal with an allowance for other cost. The hedging rule is to hedge hogs, corn and soybean meal when a profit margin of fifty-five percent above the expected profit margin can be "locked-in" with the futures. In their original paper, using data from 1975-82, Kenyon and Clay found this method of hedging stabilized cash flow while increasing the overall profit level. Using data from 1983-98, we find no difference in profits from hedging versus not hedging. The most obvious reason for the lack of success is the inability to predict the expected profit margin with the simple model used by Kenyon and Clay. Additionally, in this study as with any long-term study dealing with cost, a continuous, realistic cost structure that is available throughout the study period is a serious limitation.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:nc8191:285756
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285756
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/285756/files/confp24-99.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.285756?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nc8191:285756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.