Author
Listed:
- Lusk, Jayson
- Fox, John
- Schroeder, Ted
- Mintert, James
Abstract
Meat tenderness is one of the most important quality characteristics to beef consumers. Current beef quality grading standards are poorly correlated with meat tenderness. Even within the same quality grade, steak tenderness varies considerably. As a result of consumers frequently experiencing poor steak eating experiences, their confidence in, and demand for beef has been adversely affected. A new quality grading system, developed by USDA, more accurately segregates beef into tenderness categories. This study evaluates consumer willingness to pay for steak tenderness in an effort to evaluate this new grading system. Consumers demonstrated a preference for tender steak. Blind steak tests revealed that 72% of consumers preferred tender steak relative to tough steak (as measured via Warner-Bratzler shear force tests) in terms of tenderness preferences. In these blind taste tests, 36% of consumers were also willing to pay an average of a $1.23/lb. Premium for a tender relative to a tough steak. When information regarding tenderness was revealed to consumers together with a taste sample, 90% preferred the tender steak. Overall, 51% of consumers were willing to pay an average premium of $1.84/lb. for a tender relative to a tough steak when the level of steak tenderness was revealed to consumers.
Suggested Citation
Lusk, Jayson & Fox, John & Schroeder, Ted & Mintert, James, 1999.
"Who Will Pay for Guaranteed Tender Steak?,"
1981-1999 Conference Archive
285748, NCR-134/ NCCC-134 Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:nc8191:285748
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285748
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nc8191:285748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.