IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nc8191/285736.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Design and Evaluation of Long Term Commodity Pricing Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Unterschultz, James
  • Novak, Frank

Abstract

Window contracts and cost plus contracts are being used for managing risk in long term producer-processor contracting relationships. Window contracts place a floor price and a ceiling price on the value of the commodity to the producer. Cost plus contracts base the minimum price on the cost of inputs. These contracts can be decomposed into portfolios of specialized put and call options. Monte Carlo option valuation techniques evaluated the impact of different price process assumptions on the values in these contracts. The conclusions are that knowledge of the price process is very important. Mean reverting processes, where the mean is correctly identified, lead to lower valued implied options in both window and spread contracts. Different strike prices are required for different times to maturity if the value of floor price (put option) is to equal the value of the ceiling price (call option) for window contracts. The floor and ceiling prices for window contracts and the cost plus portion of spread contracts need to change with the expected delivery date. A contract covering 10 years of production cannot have one single set of window prices or spread cost plus components.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:nc8191:285736
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285736
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/285736/files/confp4-98.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.285736?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nc8191:285736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.