IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nbaece/413204.html

Foreign Aid

Author

Listed:
  • Peterson, E. Wesley F.

Abstract

According to a recent poll, United States adults think on average that about 26 percent of the federal government’s budget goes to foreign aid with some believing that more than half is put to that use. Public opinion surveys have returned similar results for many years with most respondents seeming to believe that this is far too generous often suggesting that something on the order of 5 percent of federal spending would be more appropriate. In fact, until recent efforts to eliminate foreign aid altogether, the actual amounts spent have represented one percent or less of the federal budget. The elimination of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and severe reductions in the spending of humanitarian and development funds appropriated by the U.S. Congress are of questionable legality and with unresolved legal challenges still in the works it is not clear precisely how the U.S. role in foreign assistance will evolve in the future. In that context, some factual information about foreign aid may be of use.

Suggested Citation

  • Peterson, E. Wesley F., 2025. "Foreign Aid," Cornhusker Economics 413204, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nbaece:413204
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.413204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/413204/files/2025-6-11%20Cornhusker%20Econ%20-%20Peterson%20-%203_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.413204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nbaece:413204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daunlus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.