IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nbaece/404864.html

How Beliefs Shape What We Consider When Choosing What to Eat

Author

Listed:
  • Gustafson, Christopher

Abstract

What determines which foods we consider? One factor, certainly, is what we like to eat, and if liking what we eat were the sole relevant outcome of food consumption, there would be little to say about incomplete consideration. However, diet quality has important, well-documented effects on health outcomes (as well as other important considerations, such as differential environmental impact). Close to 75 percent of American adults are overweight or obese, which increases the likelihood that the individual will experience one or more serious non-communicable diseases. A food’s healthiness is an important consideration for many people when making food choices, but, unlike tastiness, healthiness is more difficult to assess. Products carry nutrition facts panels displaying myriad pieces of information about nutrients, vitamins, and minerals. Whereas you get a sense of whether you like the taste of something within milliseconds, health outcomes occur over long timescales and innumerable meals, making it nearly impossible for an individual to identify the contribution of any particular food item to their current health status. In our attempts to make sense of the healthiness of foods, many of us form beliefs about the attributes of foods—which may include nutrients, such as how much protein is in a product; production practices, such as organics; or the absence of something, e.g. gluten free products—to help us categorize foods as healthy or not. Thus, even if we’re all trying to make healthy food choices, we may base those health judgments on different combinations of criteria, leading us to different beliefs about which products are healthy.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustafson, Christopher, 2025. "How Beliefs Shape What We Consider When Choosing What to Eat," Cornhusker Economics 404864, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nbaece:404864
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404864/files/Gustafson%202025%20How%20Beliefs.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nbaece:404864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daunlus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.