IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/n13419/309622.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Managing Risk in Ethanol Processing Using Formula Pricing Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Bullock, David W.
  • Wilson, William W.

Abstract

Manufacturers of ethanol face considerable pricing risk from both an input (corn and natural gas) and output (ethanol, distillers dried grains, and corn oil) in addition to the fluctuating value of the ethanol renewable identification numbers (D6 RINs) attached to each gallon of ethanol produced. Additionally, ethanol plants face technical risks related to their physical plant extraction rates for ethanol, DDGs, and corn oil along with their efficiency in using natural gas (or an alternative heat source). The purpose of this study is to examine the risk characteristics of a fixed margin, formula pricing contract applied to the ethanol industry using Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis. The margin model is set up for a typical South Dakota dry mill plant that has corn oil extraction capabilities in addition to dry DDGs. The results indicate that there are benefits to both the buyer and seller from utilizing the proposed contract. Under the average pricing scenario, the buyer can expect to pay a marginally lower mean ethanol price with a slightly lower probability of paying a high price and a slightly higher probability of paying a low price when compared to paying the spot ethanol price at delivery. At the mean, the buyer could feasibly save approximately 30 cents per gallon (on an average $1.43 delivery price) through perfect timing on setting the price components. For the seller, the gain from the contract is primarily due to a substantial reduction in margin volatility and better 5% value-atrisk (VaR) values when compared to the delivery benchmark under all three buyer pricing scenarios. The ethanol seller can also achieve gains in margin through increased ethanol extraction efficiency with an approximate 2% gain in margin for each 1% increase in the extraction rate.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:n13419:309622
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309622
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309622/files/Bullock_Wilson_NCCC-134_2019a.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309622?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:n13419:309622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.