IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/n13415/285826.html

Can Cattle Basis Forecasts Be Improved? A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Payne, Nicholas
  • Karali, Berna

Abstract

Basis forecasts aid producers and consumers of agricultural commodities in price risk management. A simple historical moving average of nearby basis on a specific date is the most common forecast approach; however, in previous evaluations of forecast methods, the best prediction of basis has often been inconsistent. The best forecast also differs with respect to commodity and forecast horizon. Given this inconsistency, a Bayesian approach which addresses model uncertainty by combining forecasts from different models is taken. Various regression models are considered for combination, and simple moving averages are evaluated for comparison. We find that model performance differs by location and forecast horizon, but the average model typically performs favorably compared to regression models. However, except for very short-horizon forecasts, the simple moving averages have a lower out of sample forecast error than the regression models. We also examine using a basis series created using a specific month’s futures contract as opposed to the nearby contract and find that basis forecasts calculated this way have lower forecast errors in the month of the contract examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Payne, Nicholas & Karali, Berna, 2015. "Can Cattle Basis Forecasts Be Improved? A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach," 2015 Conference, April 20-21, 2015, St. Louis, Missouri 285826, NCR-134/ NCCC-134 Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:n13415:285826
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/285826/files/Payne_Karali_NCCC_134_2015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.285826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:n13415:285826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.