IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/n13414/285813.html

The ‘Necessity’ of New Position Limits in Agricultural Futures Markets:

Author

Listed:
  • Sanders, Dwight R.
  • Irwin, Scott H.

Abstract

Regulators are proposing new position limits in U.S. commodity futures markets while the actual impact of long-only index funds on futures prices continues to be debated. Researchers have noted the data limitations—frequency and market breadth—associated with using data compiled by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This research addresses these shortfalls by using daily position data for a specific long-only index fund. The empirical analysis focuses on the firm-level position data across 13 U.S. agricultural futures markets. The firm-level data are shown to be representative of the overall index fund industry. Empirical tests fail to find any evidence linking the firm’s trading with market returns. However, there does appear to be a consistent negative relationship between the firm’s roll transactions and changes in calendar price spreads. Notably, the direction of this impact is opposite of price-pressure hypothesis. The results of this study, and others, indicate that a clear verdict can be reached—new limits on speculation in agricultural futures markets are unnecessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanders, Dwight R. & Irwin, Scott H., 2014. "The ‘Necessity’ of New Position Limits in Agricultural Futures Markets:," 2014 Conference, April 21-22, 2014, St. Louis, Missouri 285813, NCR-134/ NCCC-134 Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:n13414:285813
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/285813/files/Sanders_Irwin_NCCC-134_2014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.285813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:n13414:285813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.