IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/motuwp/290520.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evolution of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme: Linking

Author

Listed:
  • Leining, Catherine
  • Ormsby, Judd
  • Kerr, Suzi

Abstract

The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) was conceived as New Zealand’s gateway to the international carbon market, with two objectives: assisting New Zealand to meet its international climate change obligations; and reducing domestic net emissions below business-as-usual levels. Underlying these objectives was the principle of least-cost compliance for both the New Zealand government and NZ ETS participants. Uniquely among emissions trading schemes (ETSs) to date, from 2008 through mid-2015 the NZ ETS operated with buy-and-sell linkages to the Kyoto market that did not constrain domestic emissions and were used to set the domestic price. As international Kyoto unit prices plunged from 2011 onward, so did New Zealanders’ incentives to invest in higher-cost domestic mitigation. Instead, NZ ETS participants complied by purchasing large numbers of Kyoto units. In November 2012, the government announced it would take its post-2012 commitment under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), not the Kyoto Protocol. NZ ETS participants responded by surrendering low-cost Kyoto units and banking New Zealand Units (NZUs), which were expected to remain usable in the longer term. In mid-2015, the NZ ETS delinked from the Kyoto market. As of 2017, the NZ ETS operates as a stand-alone system, with a substantial participant-held NZU bank largely as the unintentional legacy of past linking. The government now faces important decisions about the future of unit supply in the NZ ETS and linkages to international markets. This paper examines New Zealand’s experience with linking and delinking its ETS to capture lessons that could be of value to policy makers in New Zealand and other countries. It finds that the considerable opportunities to a small ETS market from linking can be negated if the environmental, economic, and political risks are not managed strategically. It also highlights some of the technical and political challenges of negotiating bilateral linking agreements. New Zealand’s future policy on ETS linking, and more generally its support for international mitigation as part of its global contribution, need to ensure the integrity of the country’s contribution to global mitigation and support strategic domestic decarbonisation in the longer term.

Suggested Citation

  • Leining, Catherine & Ormsby, Judd & Kerr, Suzi, 2017. "Evolution of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme: Linking," Motu Working Papers 290520, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:motuwp:290520
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.290520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290520/files/17_06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.290520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:motuwp:290520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/motuenz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.