IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/miffpb/303583.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quality Comparison of Fraudulent and Registered Pesticides in Mali

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Haggblade
  • Amadou Diarra
  • Wayne Jiang
  • Amidou Assima
  • Naman Keita
  • Abdramane Traoré
  • Mamadou Traoré

Abstract

Key Findings -Pesticide markets have grown rapidly in West Africa over the past decade and a half, far faster than regulatory monitoring capacity. -As a result, fraudulent pesticides (unregistered and counterfeit) are widely sold throughout Mali. -Purchase of 100 glyphosate samples from 50 different retailers across Mali indicate that that 45% were fraudulent products. -Laboratory testing indicates that fraudulent glyphosate products contain 8-10% less active ingredient than registered products. -Farmers can protect themselves by purchasing only pesticides duly registered by the Comité Sahélien des Pesticides (CSP).

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Haggblade & Amadou Diarra & Wayne Jiang & Amidou Assima & Naman Keita & Abdramane Traoré & Mamadou Traoré, 2019. "Quality Comparison of Fraudulent and Registered Pesticides in Mali," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Briefs 303583, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:miffpb:303583
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/303583/files/PB%2B76%2Bglyphosate%2Btesting.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.303583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Food Security and Poverty; International Development;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:miffpb:303583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.