IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/midagr/11228.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Evaluation Of Food Commodity Procurement Strategies: Insights From Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, Kraig M.

Abstract

This research focuses on evaluating the main characteristics that are considered in commodity procurement decisions used by food manufacturers. The research contributes to the literature by filling a gap in both the commodity and procurement literature. There is a large literature on commodity selling, but very little on commodity procurement. Further, much of the literature on procurement focuses on non-commodity products, not commodity products. A case study approach was used to determine the factors that affect commodity procurement decisions and to examine the strategic nature of commodity procurement departments. Further, the research developed a model of commodity procurement decision making. First, a commodity procurement department must maintain supply. Once this is accomplished, a commodity procurement department can progress to a profit-focused strategy. Finally, the commodity procurement department can expand by offering additional services to customers, such as designing promotional programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, Kraig M., 2003. "An Evaluation Of Food Commodity Procurement Strategies: Insights From Case Studies," Graduate Research Master's Degree Plan B Papers 11228, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:midagr:11228
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.11228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/11228/files/pb03jo01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.11228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midagr:11228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.