Profitability Of Site-Specific Nitrogen Recommendations For Michigan Corn
Site-specific nitrogen application (SSNA) has been considered a potentially more efficient nitrogen (N) management than uniform N application (UNA), because it tailors the N application rate to meet crop needs. However, previous studies on the profitability of SSNA were inconclusive. This study examines the conventional N fertilizer recommendation as a possible reason for the poor profitability of previous SSNA studies. Most previous SSNA experiments followed state-level N recommendations based on yield goals and/or soil nutrient levels that assume corn yield response to N does not vary site-specifically. This study challenges that assumption. It examines a set of six continuous site characteristic variables, more than any previous study, in order to assess a wide range of site factors that could affect corn yield response to applied nitrogen. In examining three years of data on 14 fields in Central Michigan, this work looks at a longer time series and wider cross section than comparable research. For the first time, three years and 13 fields data are pooled together on the basis of irrigation status to provide an SSNA recipe. The results suggest that corn yield response to N does vary site-specifically, but at current prices, SSNA cannot generate enough benefits to cover its costs on most cornfields in this region.
|Date of creation:||2003|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Justin S. Morrill Hall of Agriculture, 446 West Circle Dr., Rm 202, East Lansing, MI 48824-1039|
Phone: (517) 355-4563
Fax: (517) 432-1800
Web page: http://www.aec.msu.edu/agecon/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midagr:11206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.