IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwp/329066.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rechnet sich der Einsatz von Kleegrassilage in der ökologischen Schweinemast?

Author

Listed:
  • Klinkmann, Dirk
  • Kuhnert, Heike
  • Bussemas, Ralf

Abstract

The feeding of protein in line with animal needs from regional sources is a challenge in organic pig fattening. One way to achieve this is the use of clover-grass silage, which so far has received only limited attention. In this working paper an overview and economic analysis of trials of the Thünen Institute of organic farming of feeding clover-grass silage to fattening pigs are presented. On the experimental organic farm in Trenthorst, fattening pigs are housed on straw. They were split into two groups: one group was fed clover-grass silage and a concentrate mix with reduced protein content; the control group was fed a normal mixed ration with typical protein content. The biological performance, rations and feed quantities were evaluated, supplemented with standard data for organic production from the KTBL (Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft). Subsequently, cost calculation of the trial data was carried out and compared with organic standard data without the use of roughage from KTBL. As expected for trials, daily gains, feed conversion, finishing weight, dressing percentage and feed consumption are better for both groups of the Trenthorst fattening trials, compared to the KTBL data. The two trial variants differ only very slightly in performance and costs; both groups are clearly more cost-effective than the KTBL assumptions due to lower concentrate consumption. But the feeding clover-grass silage by hand causes higher labour costs, compared to the control group. Higher prices for the other protein feeds, especially grain legumes, improve the competitiveness of clover-grass feeding, as does lack of an alternative use, if clover-grass is grown on the farm's as part of crop rotation. In summary, feeding clover-grass silage is — also financially — an interesting alternative for fattening pigs organically. For wider use on farms further improvements of labour organisation are needed. In particular, cost-effective mechanisation of feeding silage still needs to be developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Klinkmann, Dirk & Kuhnert, Heike & Bussemas, Ralf, 2022. "Rechnet sich der Einsatz von Kleegrassilage in der ökologischen Schweinemast?," Thünen Working Paper 329066, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:329066
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329066/files/dn065388.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural Finance; Farm Management;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:329066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.