IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iprwps/294817.html

Credit Constraints and Land Tenancy Markets in Rural India

Author

Listed:
  • Kochar,Anjini

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical investigation of the extent to which rural households in India are effectively constrained in the Government controlled or "formal" credit sectors by analyzing the impact of access to such credit on production decisions, in particular the decision to rent land. The linkage between land rental and credit markets is of particular interest because of its potential effect on the distribution of operated land and hence income inequality in agriculture. The extent to which access to credit affects the decision to lease land is estimated using an endogenous switching regression model which distinguishes between the leasing behavior of borrowers and nonborrowers, conditional on their credit status. The determinants of the leasing decision of borrowers is found to be significantly different from those of non-borrowers. However, there is no strong statistical support for the hypothesis that credit constraints affect leasing decision. This suggests that formal sector credit constraints are not effective, perhaps due to substitution possibilities between credit-financed capital and other inputs. This paper also finds that the increased demand for land by large farmers is primarily the result of their increased productivity and declining land size.

Suggested Citation

  • Kochar,Anjini, 1992. "Credit Constraints and Land Tenancy Markets in Rural India," Institute for Policy Reform Working Paper Series 294817, Institute for Policy Reform.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iprwps:294817
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.294817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/294817/files/ipr055.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.294817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pant, Chandrashekar, 1983. "Tenancy and family resources : A model and some empirical analysis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-2), pages 27-39.
    2. Braverman, Avishay & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1989. "Credit rationing, tenancy, productivity, and the dynamics of inequality," Policy Research Working Paper Series 176, The World Bank.
    3. James, William & Roumasset, James, 1984. "Migration and the evolution of tenure contracts in newly settled regions," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 147-162.
    4. Jaynes, Gerald David, 1982. "Production and Distribution in Agrarian Economies," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 346-367, July.
    5. Eswaran, Mukesh & Kotwal, Ashok, 1985. "A Theory of Contractual Structure in Agriculture," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 352-367, June.
    6. Zeldes, Stephen P, 1989. "Consumption and Liquidity Constraints: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(2), pages 305-346, April.
    7. Clive Bell & Chalongphob Sussangkarn, 1988. "Rationing and Adjustment in the Market for Tenancies: The Behavior of Landowning Households in Thanjavur District," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(4), pages 779-789.
    8. Nabi, Ijaz, 1985. "Rural Factor Market Imperfections and the Incidence of Tenancy in Agriculture," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(2), pages 319-329, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kochar,Anjini, 1992. "Credit Constraints and Land Tenancy Markets in Rural India," Institute for Policy Reform Archive 294817, Institute for Policy Reform.
    2. Colin, Jean-Philippe & Bouquet, Emmanuelle, 2001. "Le métayage comme partenariat. L'arrangement a médias dans la Sierra Madré orientale," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 261.
    3. M. A. Taslim, 1992. "A Survey of Theories of Cropshare Tenancy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 68(3), pages 254-275, September.
    4. Jean-Philippe Colin & Emmanuelle Bouquet, 2001. "Le métayage comme partenariat. L'arrangement a médias dans la Sierra Madré orientale," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 261(1), pages 77-92.
    5. Colin, Jean-Philippe, 1995. "De Turgot à la nouvelle économie institutionnelle. Brève revue des théories économiques du métayage," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 228.
    6. Benin, Samuel & Place, Frank & Nkonya, Ephraim M. & Pender, John L., 2006. "Land Markets and Agricultural Land Use Efficiency and Sustainability: Evidence from East Africa," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25645, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Klaus Deininger & Songqing Jin, 2008. "Land Sales and Rental Markets in Transition: Evidence from Rural Vietnam," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 70(1), pages 67-101, February.
    8. Colin, Jean-Philippe & Bouquet, Emmanuelle, 2001. "Le metayage comme partenariat. L'arrangement a medias dans la Sierra Madre orientale," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 261.
    9. Chunrong Ai & Jean-Louis Arcand & François Éthier, 1998. "Inefficacité marshallienne, partage de coûts et modèles contractuels avec marchés manquants," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 74(3), pages 315-341.
    10. Michael R. CARTER & Alain de JANVRY & Elisabeth SADOULET & Alexandros SARRIS, 2014. "Index-based weather insurance for developing countries: A review of evidence and a set of propositions for up-scaling," Working Papers P111, FERDI.
    11. Corrado, Luisa & Silgado-Gómez, Edgar & Yoo, Donghoon & Waldmann, Robert, 2022. "Ambiguous economic news and heterogeneity: What explains asymmetric consumption responses?," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Deininger, Klaus, 1995. "Collective agricultural production: A solution for transition economies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(8), pages 1317-1334, August.
    13. Anikó Bíró, 2013. "Subjective mortality hazard shocks and the adjustment of consumption expenditures," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 1379-1408, October.
    14. Tran, Minh Chau & Gan, Christopher & Hu, Baiding, 2014. "Credit Constraints and Impact on Farm Household Welfare: Evidence from Vietnam’s North Central Coast region," 2014 Conference, August 28-29, 2014, Nelson, New Zealand 187495, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Lee, Jeong-Joon & Sawada, Yasuyuki, 2007. "The degree of precautionary saving: A reexamination," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 196-201, August.
    16. Juliano Junqueira Assunção, 2005. "Non-agricultural land use and land reform: theory and evidence from Brazil," Textos para discussão 496, Department of Economics PUC-Rio (Brazil).
    17. East, Chloe N. & Kuka, Elira, 2015. "Reexamining the consumption smoothing benefits of Unemployment Insurance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 32-50.
    18. Roussey, Ludivine & Soubeyran, Raphael, 2018. "Overburdened judges," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 21-32.
    19. Patnaik, Unmesh & Narayanan, K, 2010. "Vulnerability and Coping to Disasters: A Study of Household Behaviour in Flood Prone Region of India," MPRA Paper 21992, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2015. "New Theoretical Perspectives on the Distribution of Income and Wealth among Individuals: Part II: Equilibrium Wealth Distributions," NBER Working Papers 21190, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iprwps:294817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.