Author
Listed:
- Ochieng, Justus
- Owuor, George
- Bebe, Bockline Omedo
Abstract
Despite intensive dissemination of management intervention package, there is low productivity and commercialization of indigenous chicken (Gallus domesticus) in Africa. The management intervention package comprises feed supplementation, housing, chick rearing, brooding and vaccination. Smallholder farmers often regard these management interventions as costly, risky, unprofitable, and inaccessible and that they require high technical knowledge. This paper emphasizes the role of management intervention package in productivity of smallholder indigenous chicken farmers. Principal Component Analysis combined with Cluster analysis was used to determine three homogenous groups adopting management interventions. The three groups are; feed supplementation and vaccination adopters, feed supplementation and brooding adopters and Full management intervention package adopters. The effect of these adopted management interventions was then analyzed using log linear regression model which takes the form of Cobb-Douglas production function. The results indicated that farmers who had adopted full management intervention package as recommended by extension had higher productive performance than farmers who modified and selectively adopted components of management intervention package. Other socio-economic factors that significantly influenced productivity were farm production assets, expenditure on feeds, labour, access to extension, group membership and female gender. The study recommends the formulation and implementation of pro-poor policies aimed at improving socio-economic conditions of the smallholders to enable them fully adopt the recommended management intervention package. This would increase productivity of indigenous chicken thereby improving food and income security in rural areas of Africa.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ifprcp:102551
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.102551
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifprcp:102551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.