IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iffp21/42220.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparative Study of FAO and USDA Data on Production, Area, and Trade of Major Food Staples

Author

Listed:
  • Paulino, Leonardo A.
  • Tseng, Shen Sheng

Abstract

The setting of priorities for policy research at the International Food Policy Research Institute depends largely on an understanding of basic national and global trends in food production, consumption, and trade. Although IFPRI draws heavily on the analyses by FAO and other agencies for much of this information, it is also intensely examines the basic data, not only to carefully adjust its own program but to judge independently the key variable in these trends. Initially IFPRI worked largely from USDA data, but recent efforts have depended primarily on FAO statistics. This experience with the published data of both agencies has led Leonardo Paulino and Shen Sheng Tseng to undertake this analyses available to the research community at large, we hope to encourage an expanded dialogue on ways of improving the agricultural data. Solutions to many of the world’s food problems require policies that can only be debated, agreed upon, and implemented if there is a consensus about the underlying facts. This study points up the underlying facts. This study points up the uncertainly of some of the information on agricultural production and trade. Lack of confidence in such data not only inhabits diagnosis of problems but prejudices the choice of policy instruments. For example, it is unlikely that agreement can be reached on operating rules for global food security schemes based on changes in domestic production as long as doubts about the data exist. Thus, it is imperative that developing countries in particular improve their capacity to assemble more reliable statistics on food production, consumption, and trade so that strides can ne made in policy development.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:iffp21:42220
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42220
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42220/files/rr19.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.42220?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iffp21:42220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.