IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iffp21/42171.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Storage, Trade, and Price Policy Under Production Instability: Maize In Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Pinckney, Thomas C.

Abstract

Instability in the production of a staple food causes severe hardship for many countries. For a country that is self-sufficient in its staple food in a normal production year, the large swings in price and consumption that result from an exclusive and uninhibited reliance on trade to stabilize prices are unacceptable. Most countries, therefore, intervene in their domestic cereal markets and move supplies from surpluses to deficit years through storage or by subsidizing international trade. The appropriate method of intervention and the most efficient way to achieve supply stability thus became topics of study. For the most part, economist have encouraged governments to rely more on trade than on stocks to make up deficits on years of production shortfalls. Trade becomes less appealing as an option the larger the difference between import and export parity prices, and the greater the deviation in physical characteristics between the domestically consumed commodity and the imported commodity. Storage is more likely to be appropriate for African countries, since many of them have high transport costs and consume a commodity -white maize-that is often in short supple on world markets. The International Food Policy Research Institute has examined these issues previously in books and research reports. Food Security for Developing Countries, edited by Alberto Valdes, discussed these issues in some detail. International Finance for Food Security, edited by Barbara Huddleston et al., is a study of ways that the international community can remove some of the risk of relying on trade rather than stocks. In IFPRI Research Report 26, Food Security in the Sahel: Variable import Levy, Grain Reserves, and Foreign Exchange Assistance, John McIntire examines various policy options for dealing with instability in the Sahelian region. In this report, Thomas Pinckney developed a general framework for studying these issues and applies it to the case of Kenya. The framework builds both on the optimal storage literature and on simulation studies. Trade-offs between the government objectives of minimizing price fluctuations, imports, and fiscal costs are measured explicitly. The techniques that make optimal policies superior to simpler price band/buffer stock policies are studied in order to provide clues for efficient policy design. In terms of the storage/trade debate, this report finds that Kenya does indeed have a strong rationale for a significant amount of storage when world maize prices are at their present low levels. Techniques developed in this research report have been modified and applied to Pakistan and will be applied to several Southern African countries in the future. This will provide the coherent set of studies to make generalizations about these important questions.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:iffp21:42171
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42171
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42171/files/rr71.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.42171?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iffp21:42171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.